VALMET 505/505-4 or VALMET 6000-4?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VALMET 6000-4: three-point lift.
- The VALMET 6000-4 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 10% (409 kg / 902 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 505/505-4 | 6000-4 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 45.0 kW (60.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505” | 45.0 kW (60.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6000” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 505/505-4 and the 6000-4. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 505/505-4 and the 6000-4. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 80.3 L/min (21.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6000” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 505/505-4. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,946 kg (8,699 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505” | 4,355 kg (9,601 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6000” | AheadThe VALMET 6000-4 has 10% more lift (409 kg / 902 lb) than the VALMET 505/505-4 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,520 kg (7,760 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505” | 4,170 kg (9,193 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6000” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 6000-4 is 18% heavier (650 kg / 1,433 lb) than the VALMET 505/505-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6000” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 505/505-4. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505” | 12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6000” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 505/505-4 and the 6000-4. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6000” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6000” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6000” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6000” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1983–1989 | 1993–1996 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 6000-4 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VALMET 6000-4 has 10% more lift (409 kg / 902 lb) than the VALMET 505/505-4 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 6000-4 is 18% heavier (650 kg / 1,433 lb) than the VALMET 505/505-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 6000-4 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources