UTB 302 Dtce-IF vs WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B
11 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 302 Dtce-IF and the WT-32 B → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
11 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 302 Dtce-IF | WT-32 B | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 29.6 hp | 29.6 hp | — |
| Engine declared | UTB D-111.057 | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-144 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 1.80 L | 2.36 L | +31% WT-32 B |
| Maximum torque declared | 82 lb·ft · 111 N·m | 105 lb·ft · 142 N·m | +28% WT-32 B |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | +20% WT-32 B |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated, dry two-stage double clutch | Pedal operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single plate clutch type K-16 | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 6.6 gpm · 25.0 L/min | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 2,646 lb · 1,200 kg | 3,968 lb · 1,800 kg | +50% WT-32 B |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 6,118 lb · 2,775 kg | 3,417 lb · 1,550 kg | +79% 302 Dtce-IF |
| Wheelbase declared | 70.9 in · 1,800 mm | 77.6 in · 1,970 mm | +9% WT-32 B |
| Length declared | 110.4 in · 2,805 mm | 128.3 in · 3,260 mm | +16% WT-32 B |
| Width declared | 59.4 in · 1,510 mm | 60.2 in · 1,530 mm | — |
| Height declared | 86.6 in · 2,200 mm | 59.8 in · 1,520 mm | +45% 302 Dtce-IF |
| Ground clearance declared | — | 15.6 in · 395 mm | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 57.1 qt · 54.0 L | 38.0 qt · 36.0 L | +50% 302 Dtce-IF |
UTB 302 Dtce-IF sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 302 DTCE IF”
WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 32B”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-250”