Steyr 360 Kompakt vs ZETOR 8641
12 material differences
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 360 Kompakt and the 8641 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
12 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 360 Kompakt | 8641 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 58.2 hp | 79.9 hp | +37% 8641 |
| Engine declared | IVECO 8035.05 C | ZETOR Z-1203 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.93 L | 4.16 L | +42% 8641 |
| Maximum torque declared | 159 lb·ft · 216 N·m | 230 lb·ft · 312 N·m | +44% 8641 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h | 18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | — | Pedal-operated dry Zetor single-disc clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 13.8 gpm · 52.1 L/min | 15.1 gpm · 57.0 L/min | +9% 8641 |
| Pressure declared | — | 1,813 psi · 125 bar | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | — | 12,456 lb · 5,650 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 430/540/540E rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 6,283 lb · 2,850 kg | 9,678 lb · 4,390 kg | +54% 8641 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 10,582 lb · 4,800 kg | 14,771 lb · 6,700 kg | +40% 8641 |
| Wheelbase declared | 81.3 in · 2,065 mm | 94.0 in · 2,388 mm | +16% 8641 |
| Length declared | 135.4 in · 3,440 mm | 189.6 in · 4,815 mm | +40% 8641 |
| Width declared | 90.6 in · 2,300 mm | 80.7 in · 2,050 mm | +12% 360 Kompakt |
| Height declared | 94.9 in · 2,410 mm | 106.9 in · 2,715 mm | +13% 8641 |
| Ground clearance declared | 13.8 in · 350 mm | 13.4 in · 340 mm | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 74.0 qt · 70.0 L | 190.2 qt · 180.0 L | +157% 8641 |
Steyr 360 Kompakt sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt”
ZETOR 8641 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (1999-2002)”