SAME Atlanta-V (DT) or VALMET 361 D?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Atlanta-V (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 361 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The VALMET 361D suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 83% (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The VALMET 361D suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for SAME Atlanta-V (DT) and VALMET 361 D, with the call on each
QuestionAtlanta-V (DT)361 DCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta V (DT)”30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Atlanta-V (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 361 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Atlanta-V (DT) and the 361 D.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Atlanta-V (DT) and the 361 D.
Which pumps more oil for implements?12.0 L/min (3.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta V (DT)”22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”AheadThe VALMET 361D has 83% more hydraulic flow (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the SAME Atlanta-V (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—1,350 kg (2,976 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Atlanta-V (DT).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,580 kg (3,483 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta V (DT)”1,770 kg (3,902 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 361D is 12% heavier (190 kg / 419 lb) than the SAME Atlanta-V (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Atlanta-V (DT) and the 361 D.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 9Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta V (DT)”6Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Atlanta-V (DT) and the 361 D.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta V (DT)”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”AheadThe VALMET 361D has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the SAME Atlanta-V (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta V (DT)”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta V (DT)”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 361 D.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta V (DT)”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”AheadThe SAME Atlanta-V (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the VALMET 361D is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1965–19681960–1965Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Atlanta-V (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 361D has 83% more hydraulic flow (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the SAME Atlanta-V (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 361D is 12% heavier (190 kg / 419 lb) than the SAME Atlanta-V (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 361D has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the SAME Atlanta-V (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Atlanta-V (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the VALMET 361D is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The SAME Atlanta-V (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Atlanta-V (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 361 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources