Nuffield 4/65 (465) vs ZETOR 6711
11 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 4/65 (465) and the 6711 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
11 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 4/65 (465) | 6711 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 65.0 hp | 64.1 hp | — |
| Engine declared | BMC 38 TD | ZETOR Z-6701 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 3.77 L | 3.46 L | +9% 4/65 (465) |
| Maximum torque declared | 167 lb·ft · 227 N·m | 148 lb·ft · 201 N·m | +13% 4/65 (465) |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | +20% 4/65 (465) |
| Clutch declared | — | Pedal-actuated, dry two-stage ZETOR double clutch with mechanical clutch booster | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min | 5.3 gpm · 20.0 L/min | +50% 4/65 (465) |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,748 lb · 1,700 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 5,657 lb · 2,566 kg | 5,776 lb · 2,620 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 80.0 in · 2,032 mm | 88.5 in · 2,247 mm | +11% 6711 |
| Length declared | 128.0 in · 3,250 mm | 144.5 in · 3,670 mm | +13% 6711 |
| Width declared | 81.5 in · 2,070 mm | 70.5 in · 1,790 mm | +16% 4/65 (465) |
| Height declared | 90.5 in · 2,299 mm | 64.4 in · 1,635 mm | +41% 4/65 (465) |
| Ground clearance declared | 17.0 in · 432 mm | 13.0 in · 330 mm | +31% 4/65 (465) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.3 ft · 3.43 m | 11.7 ft · 3.56 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 74.5 qt · 70.5 L | 83.5 qt · 79.0 L | +12% 6711 |
Nuffield 4/65 (465) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 4/65 (1967-1969)”
ZETOR 6711 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711”