Nuffield 4/65 (465) vs VALMET 602
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because they were not built in overlapping years (1967–1969; 1978–1982). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
10 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 4/65 (465) | 602 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 65.0 hp | 57.3 hp | +14% 4/65 (465) |
| Engine declared | BMC 38 TD | VALMET 311 C | differs |
| Displacement declared | 3.77 L | 3.30 L | +14% 4/65 (465) |
| Maximum torque declared | 167 lb·ft · 227 N·m | 155 lb·ft · 210 N·m | +8% 4/65 (465) |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | — | Dry BORG & BECK double clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min | 8.2 gpm · 30.9 L/min | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,748 lb · 1,700 kg | 3,748 lb · 1,700 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 5,657 lb · 2,566 kg | 6,129 lb · 2,780 kg | +8% 602 |
| Wheelbase declared | 80.0 in · 2,032 mm | 83.1 in · 2,112 mm | — |
| Length declared | 128.0 in · 3,250 mm | 137.3 in · 3,487 mm | +7% 602 |
| Width declared | 81.5 in · 2,070 mm | 69.6 in · 1,769 mm | +17% 4/65 (465) |
| Height declared | 90.5 in · 2,299 mm | 99.2 in · 2,520 mm | +10% 602 |
| Ground clearance declared | 17.0 in · 432 mm | 18.9 in · 480 mm | +11% 602 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.3 ft · 3.43 m | 9.8 ft · 3.00 m | +14% 4/65 (465) |
| Fuel tank declared | 74.5 qt · 70.5 L | 68.7 qt · 65.0 L | +8% 4/65 (465) |
Nuffield 4/65 (465) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 4/65 (1967-1969)”
VALMET 602 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 602”