New Holland T 5030 or VALMET 865-2/865?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the New Holland T 5030: three-point lift. It is also ahead on PTO speeds.
- The New Holland T 5030 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The New Holland T 5030 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 43% (1,435 kg / 3,164 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | T 5030 | 865-2/865 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 51.1 kW (68.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | 52.0 kW (69.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 865” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the T 5030 and the 865-2/865. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the T 5030 and the 865-2/865. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 62.5 L/min (16.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | 57.0 L/min (15.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 865” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | 3,365 kg (7,419 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 865” | AheadThe New Holland T 5030 has 43% more lift (1,435 kg / 3,164 lb) than the VALMET 865-2/865 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,750 kg (8,267 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | 3,190 kg (7,033 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 865” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 5030 is 18% heavier (560 kg / 1,235 lb) than the VALMET 865-2/865 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 6,200 kg (13,669 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 865-2/865. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 865” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the T 5030 and the 865-2/865. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 865” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | 540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 865” | AheadThe New Holland T 5030 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 865-2/865 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 865” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 865” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2008–2012 | 1996–1997 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 5030 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland T 5030 has 43% more lift (1,435 kg / 3,164 lb) than the VALMET 865-2/865 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland T 5030 is 18% heavier (560 kg / 1,235 lb) than the VALMET 865-2/865 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland T 5030 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 865-2/865 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The New Holland T 5030 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources