MASSEY-HARRIS Pony 820 vs Warchalowski WT 20

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1957–1961

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1958–1968

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Pony 820 and the WT 20 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

MASSEY-HARRIS Pony 820 and Warchalowski WT 20, field by field
Field	Pony 820	WT 20	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	18.0 hp	17.7 hp	—
Engine declared	HANOMAG D 621-E 54	WARCHALOWSKI D-22	differs
Displacement declared	1.02 L	1.15 L	+12% WT 20
Maximum torque declared	58 lb·ft · 78 N·m	—	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	9.3 mph · 15 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+67% WT 20
Clutch declared	—	pedal-operated dry single-disc clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	2.5 gpm · 9.5 L/min	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	2,822 lb · 1,280 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	534 rpm	540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	2,315 lb · 1,050 kg	1,951 lb · 885 kg	+19% Pony 820
Wheelbase declared	67.3 in · 1,710 mm	66.9 in · 1,700 mm	—
Length declared	110.2 in · 2,800 mm	100.8 in · 2,560 mm	+9% Pony 820
Width declared	56.0 in · 1,422 mm	57.5 in · 1,460 mm	—
Height declared	60.0 in · 1,524 mm	57.1 in · 1,450 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	18.5 in · 470 mm	17.3 in · 440 mm	+7% Pony 820
Turning radius, braked declared	—	7.5 ft · 2.30 m	—
Fuel tank declared	27.5 qt · 26.0 L	22.2 qt · 21.0 L	+24% Pony 820

Source

Source