MASSEY-HARRIS Pacer 16 vs Warchalowski WT 20

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1953–1955

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1958–1968

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Pacer 16 and the WT 20 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

MASSEY-HARRIS Pacer 16 and Warchalowski WT 20, field by field
Field	Pacer 16	WT 20	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	17.3 hp	17.7 hp	—
Engine declared	CONTINENTAL Y-91	WARCHALOWSKI D-22	differs
Displacement declared	1.49 L	1.15 L	+30% Pacer 16
Transmission
Top speed declared	8.1 mph · 13 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+92% WT 20
Clutch declared	—	pedal-operated dry single-disc clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	3.0 gpm · 11.4 L/min	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	2,822 lb · 1,280 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	2,264 lb · 1,027 kg	1,951 lb · 885 kg	+16% Pacer 16
Wheelbase declared	72.4 in · 1,838 mm	66.9 in · 1,700 mm	+8% Pacer 16
Length declared	103.6 in · 2,631 mm	100.8 in · 2,560 mm	—
Width declared	62.6 in · 1,590 mm	57.5 in · 1,460 mm	+9% Pacer 16
Height declared	65.9 in · 1,673 mm	57.1 in · 1,450 mm	+15% Pacer 16
Ground clearance declared	20.5 in · 521 mm	17.3 in · 440 mm	+18% Pacer 16
Turning radius, braked declared	—	7.5 ft · 2.30 m	—
Fuel tank declared	30.0 qt · 28.4 L	22.2 qt · 21.0 L	+35% Pacer 16

Source

Source