Massey Ferguson MF 699 vs VALMET 805/805-4

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1984–1986

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1983–1989

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MF 699 and the 805/805-4 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Massey Ferguson MF 699 and VALMET 805/805-4, field by field
Field	MF 699	805/805-4	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	94 hp	93.7 hp	—
Engine declared	Perkins A 6.354	VALMET TD 44 DS 8	differs
Displacement declared	5.80 L	4.40 L	+32% MF 699
Maximum torque declared	255 lb·ft · 346 N·m	270 lb·ft · 366 N·m	+6% 805/805-4
Transmission
Top speed declared	19.9 mph · 32 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	+7% MF 699
Clutch declared	Dry disc clutch	Pedal-operated dry LuK single-plate clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic control declared	Constant flow	—	—
Pump flow declared	16.8 gpm · 63.5 L/min	13.5 gpm · 51.2 L/min	+24% MF 699
Pressure declared	—	2,901 psi · 200 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	9,149 lb · 4,150 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	8,984 lb · 4,075 kg	7,804 lb · 3,540 kg	+15% MF 699
Wheelbase declared	101.6 in · 2,580 mm	93.9 in · 2,385 mm	+8% MF 699
Length declared	166.9 in · 4,240 mm	177.8 in · 4,515 mm	+6% 805/805-4
Width declared	—	83.9 in · 2,130 mm	—
Height declared	108.3 in · 2,750 mm	106.5 in · 2,705 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	—	18.7 in · 475 mm	—
Fuel tank declared	—	190.2 qt · 180.0 L	—

Source

Source