Massey Ferguson MF 65 Mark-II vs UTB Universal 600

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1961–1964

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

from 1974

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MF 65 Mark-II and the Universal 600 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Massey Ferguson MF 65 Mark-II and UTB Universal 600, field by field
Field	MF 65 Mark-II	Universal 600	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	57.3 hp	57.3 hp	—
Engine declared	Perkins AD 4.203	UTB D-121 A	differs
Displacement declared	3.34 L	3.12 L	+7% MF 65 Mark-II
Maximum torque declared	169 lb·ft · 228 N·m	134 lb·ft · 182 N·m	+25% MF 65 Mark-II
Transmission
Top speed declared	12.4 mph · 20 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+25% Universal 600
Clutch declared	Pedal operated dry and air-cooled Laycock double clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	4.0 gpm · 15.1 L/min	5.8 gpm · 21.8 L/min	+44% Universal 600
Pressure declared	2,489 psi · 172 bar	1,856 psi · 128 bar	+34% MF 65 Mark-II
Three-point lift at ends declared	2,500 lb · 1,134 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	4,575 lb · 2,075 kg	4,519 lb · 2,050 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	84.2 in · 2,138 mm	81.1 in · 2,060 mm	—
Length declared	135.8 in · 3,450 mm	135.0 in · 3,430 mm	—
Width declared	72.4 in · 1,840 mm	59.8 in · 1,520 mm	+21% MF 65 Mark-II
Height declared	63.4 in · 1,610 mm	98.0 in · 2,490 mm	+55% Universal 600
Ground clearance declared	14.2 in · 360 mm	18.5 in · 470 mm	+31% Universal 600
Turning radius, braked declared	11.5 ft · 3.50 m	11.2 ft · 3.40 m	—
Fuel tank declared	52.8 qt · 50 L	57.1 qt · 54.0 L	+8% Universal 600

Source

Source