Massey Ferguson MF 3050 E vs VALMET 565/II

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1988–1995

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1992–1997

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MF 3050 E and the 565/II → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Massey Ferguson MF 3050 E and VALMET 565/II, field by field
Field	MF 3050 E	565/II	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	70.1 hp	74.0 hp	+6% 565/II
Engine declared	Perkins A 4.236 LD	VALMET 320 DS	differs
Displacement declared	3.86 L	3.30 L	+17% MF 3050 E
Maximum torque declared	187 lb·ft · 253 N·m	203 lb·ft · 275 N·m	+9% 565/II
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	pedal-operated, dry and air-cooled VALEO single-plate clutch	Dry LuK double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Open centre	—
Pump flow declared	—	14.5 gpm · 55.0 L/min	—
Pressure declared	—	2,901 psi · 200 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	6,351 lb · 2,881 kg	5,688 lb · 2,580 kg	+12% MF 3050 E
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540E/540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	7,848 lb · 3,560 kg	6,834 lb · 3,100 kg	+15% MF 3050 E
Wheelbase declared	93.3 in · 2,371 mm	88.8 in · 2,255 mm	—
Length declared	155.5 in · 3,950 mm	152.4 in · 3,870 mm	—
Width declared	78.3 in · 1,990 mm	79.9 in · 2,030 mm	—
Height declared	103.1 in · 2,620 mm	104.5 in · 2,655 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	14.6 in · 370 mm	18.1 in · 460 mm	+24% 565/II
Turning radius, braked declared	—	13.8 ft · 4.20 m	—
Fuel tank declared	156.4 qt · 148.0 L	77.1 qt · 73.0 L	+103% MF 3050 E

Source

Source