Massey Ferguson MF 1134 (A) or VALMET 1502?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 1134 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1502 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 51% (1,830 kg / 4,034 lb) more three-point lift.
- The VALMET 1502 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MF 1134 (A) | 1502 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | 100 kW (134 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1502” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 1134 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1502 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 1134 (A) and the 1502. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 1134 (A) and the 1502. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 58.5 L/min (15.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1502. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | 3,570 kg (7,871 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1502” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) has 51% more lift (1,830 kg / 4,034 lb) than the VALMET 1502 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,050 kg (11,133 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | 7,470 kg (16,469 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1502” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 1502 is 48% heavier (2,420 kg / 5,335 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 1134 (A) and the 1502. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1502” | AheadThe VALMET 1502 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 1134 (A) and the 1502. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1502” | AheadThe VALMET 1502 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1502” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1502” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1502” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1978–1990 | 1975–1980 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) has 51% more lift (1,830 kg / 4,034 lb) than the VALMET 1502 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 1502 is 48% heavier (2,420 kg / 5,335 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 1502 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 1502 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 1134 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1502 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources