Massey Ferguson MF 8270 A or New Holland TG 230 (Traktorenlexikon)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the New Holland TG 230: hydraulic flow. On features, the Massey Ferguson MF 8270 A is ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 8270 A suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 540 rpm.
  • The New Holland TG 230 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 20% (24.0 L/min / 6.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 8270 A and New Holland TG 230 (Traktorenlexikon), with the call on each
QuestionMF 8270 ATG 230Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?160.0 kW (214.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”159.3 kW (213.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 8270 A and the TG 230.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 8270 A and the TG 230.
Which pumps more oil for implements?122.5 L/min (32.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”146.5 L/min (38.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”AheadThe New Holland TG 230 has 20% more hydraulic flow (24.0 L/min / 6.3 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8270 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?10,401 kg (22,931 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the TG 230.
Which is heavier, for traction?9,795 kg (21,594 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”9,231 kg (20,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 8270 A and the TG 230.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 8270 A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland TG 230 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG230”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1999–20022002–2005EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TG 230 has 20% more hydraulic flow (24.0 L/min / 6.3 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8270 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 8270 A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland TG 230 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources