12 material differences

Tractor oneMassey Ferguson MF 6235 (A)1999–2003No measured PTO figureTractor twoSAME Golden 75 Compatto (SAME)1998–2003No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MF 6235 (A) and the Golden 75 Compatto → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

12 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Massey Ferguson MF 6235 (A) and SAME Golden 75 Compatto (SAME), field by field
FieldMF 6235 (A)Golden 75 CompattoGap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed74.0 hp74.0 hp—
Engine declaredPerkins 1004.4 TSAME-DEUTZ-FAHR 1000.4 A 3differs
Displacement declared3.99 L4.00 L—
Maximum torque declared213 lb·ft · 289 N·m174 lb·ft · 236 N·m+22% MF 6235 (A)
Transmission
Top speed declared24.9 mph · 40 km/h24.9 mph · 40 km/h—
Clutch declaredPedal-operated hydraulic VALEO multi-plate clutchPedal-operated dry single-plate clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared—9.0 gpm · 33.9 L/min—
Pressure declared3,336 psi · 230 bar3,118 psi · 215 bar+7% MF 6235 (A)
Rear PTO speeds declared540/1000/540E/1000E rpm540/1000 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared8,422 lb · 3,820 kg5,490 lb · 2,490 kg+53% MF 6235 (A)
Maximum permissible mass declared17,637 lb · 8,000 kg——
Wheelbase declared97.8 in · 2,485 mm80.9 in · 2,056 mm+21% MF 6235 (A)
Length declared162.8 in · 4,134 mm140.2 in · 3,561 mm+16% MF 6235 (A)
Width declared75.7–86.3 in · 1,922–2,193 mm50.8–64.6 in · 1,290–1,640 mmdiffers
Height, over the cab declared104.4 in · 2,651 mm83.1 in · 2,110 mm+26% MF 6235 (A)
Ground clearance declared15.0 in · 380 mm9.1 in · 230 mm+65% MF 6235 (A)
Turning radius, braked declared—13.8 ft · 4.20 m—
Fuel tank declared137.4 qt · 130.0 L58.1 qt · 55.0 L+136% MF 6235 (A)

Massey Ferguson MF 6235 (A) sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6235”

SAME Golden 75 Compatto (SAME) sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 75 Compatto”
  • Source: OECD test report 1855, 1999