Leyland 384 vs Nuffield 4/65 (465)
5 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 384 and the 4/65 (465) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
5 material differences · 10 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 384 | 4/65 (465) | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 70.0 hp | 65.0 hp | +8% 384 |
| Engine declared | LEYLAND-MOTORS 38 TD | BMC 38 TD | differs |
| Displacement declared | 3.77 L | 3.77 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 174 lb·ft · 236 N·m | 167 lb·ft · 227 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Dry BORG & BECK double clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min | 7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,351 lb · 1,520 kg | 3,748 lb · 1,700 kg | +12% 4/65 (465) |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 4,718 lb · 2,140 kg | 5,657 lb · 2,566 kg | +20% 4/65 (465) |
| Wheelbase declared | 80.0 in · 2,032 mm | 80.0 in · 2,032 mm | — |
| Length declared | 134.0 in · 3,404 mm | 128.0 in · 3,250 mm | — |
| Width declared | 68.6 in · 1,742 mm | 81.5 in · 2,070 mm | +19% 4/65 (465) |
| Height declared | 87.8 in · 2,230 mm | 90.5 in · 2,299 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 18.2 in · 462 mm | 17.0 in · 432 mm | +7% 384 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.3 ft · 3.43 m | 11.3 ft · 3.43 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 71.9 qt · 68.0 L | 74.5 qt · 70.5 L | — |
Leyland 384 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 384”
Nuffield 4/65 (465) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield 4/65 (1967-1969)”