Leyland 245 or UZINA TRACTORUL 420 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Leyland 245: hydraulic flow. On features, the UZINA TRACTORUL 420 (DT) is ahead on drive.

  • The Leyland 245 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 89% (14.2 L/min / 3.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Leyland 245 and UZINA TRACTORUL 420 (DT), with the call on each
Question245420 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?26.4 kW (35.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 245”26.0 kW (34.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB 420 (DT)”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 245 and the 420 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 245 and the 420 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?30.2 L/min (8.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 245”16.0 L/min (4.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB 420 (DT)”AheadThe Leyland 245 has 89% more hydraulic flow (14.2 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the UZINA TRACTORUL 420 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,700 kg (3,748 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 245”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 420 (DT).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,375 kg (5,236 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 245”1,640 kg (3,616 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB 420 (DT)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Leyland 245 is 45% heavier (735 kg / 1,620 lb) than the UZINA TRACTORUL 420 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 245 and the 420 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?10Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 245”6 to 9Traktorenlexikon, “UTB 420 (DT)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 245 and the 420 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?26 km/h (16.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 245”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB 420 (DT)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 245”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB 420 (DT)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 245”independentTraktorenlexikon, “UTB 420 (DT)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 245”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “UTB 420 (DT)”AheadThe UZINA TRACTORUL 420 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 245 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1973–19751974–1981EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Leyland 245 has 89% more hydraulic flow (14.2 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the UZINA TRACTORUL 420 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Leyland 245 is 45% heavier (735 kg / 1,620 lb) than the UZINA TRACTORUL 420 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The UZINA TRACTORUL 420 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 245 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources