Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) or Renault 80 S/F?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80 S/F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 41% (660 kg / 1,455 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) | 80 S/F | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 41.2 kW (55.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 41.2 kW (55.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80 S/F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the 80 S/F. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the 80 S/F. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 36.5 L/min (9.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 26.8 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | AheadThe Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has 36% more hydraulic flow (9.7 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Renault 80 S/F (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,009 kg (4,429 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 2,640 kg (5,820 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | AheadThe Renault 80 S/F has 31% more lift (631 kg / 1,391 lb) than the Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,255 kg (4,971 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 1,595 kg (3,516 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is 41% heavier (660 kg / 1,455 lb) than the Renault 80 S/F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the 80 S/F. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the 80 S/F. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | AheadThe Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 80 S/F (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | AheadThe Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 80 S/F does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | AheadThe Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 80 S/F is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1983–1987 | 1976–1984 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has 36% more hydraulic flow (9.7 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Renault 80 S/F (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 80 S/F has 31% more lift (631 kg / 1,391 lb) than the Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is 41% heavier (660 kg / 1,455 lb) than the Renault 80 S/F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 80 S/F (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 80 S/F does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 80 S/F is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80 S/F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources