Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) or Massey Ferguson MF 560?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 560 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 12% (209 kg / 461 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) | MF 560 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 41.2 kW (55.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 41.2 kW (55.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 560 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the MF 560. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the MF 560. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 36.5 L/min (9.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 560. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,009 kg (4,429 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560” | AheadThe Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has 12% more lift (209 kg / 461 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 560 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,255 kg (4,971 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 2,770 kg (6,107 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 560 is 23% heavier (515 kg / 1,135 lb) than the Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the MF 560. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) and the MF 560. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560” | AheadThe Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 560 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560” | AheadThe Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson 560 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6030 (DT)” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 560” | AheadThe Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson 560 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1983–1987 | 1976–1979 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has 12% more lift (209 kg / 461 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 560 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 560 is 23% heavier (515 kg / 1,135 lb) than the Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 560 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson 560 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson 560 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Landini 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6030 (DT) TL-39 N/B (TL-39 DT/B) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 560 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources