Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" or New Holland 3935 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3935 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" and New Holland 3935 (A), with the call on each
QuestionR-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A"3935 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3935”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3935 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" and the 3935 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" and the 3935 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?28.6 L/min (7.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”32.8 L/min (8.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3935”AheadThe New Holland 3935 (A) has 15% more hydraulic flow (4.2 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,050 kg (4,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”1,570 kg (3,461 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3935”AheadThe Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has 31% more lift (480 kg / 1,058 lb) than the New Holland 3935 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,010 kg (4,431 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”1,930 kg (4,255 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3935”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?—3,850 kg (8,488 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3935”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A".
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3935”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" and the 3935 (A).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3935”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3935”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3935”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A".
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3935”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1973–19831969–1999EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland 3935 (A) has 15% more hydraulic flow (4.2 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has 31% more lift (480 kg / 1,058 lb) than the New Holland 3935 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3935 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources