Landini 10.000 (DT) or SAME Tiger SIX 105?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 10.000 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Tiger SIX 105 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Landini 10.000 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 55% (16.5 L/min / 4.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 10.000 (DT) | Tiger SIX 105 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 73.5 kW (98.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10000” | 73.5 kW (98.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger Six 105” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 10.000 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Tiger SIX 105 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 10.000 (DT) and the Tiger SIX 105. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 10.000 (DT) and the Tiger SIX 105. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 46.5 L/min (12.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10000” | 30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger Six 105” | AheadThe Landini 10.000 (DT) has 55% more hydraulic flow (16.5 L/min / 4.4 gpm) than the SAME Tiger SIX 105 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,060 kg (6,746 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10000” | 4,240 kg (9,348 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger Six 105” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 10.000 (DT): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10000”); the Tiger SIX 105: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger Six 105”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,525 kg (9,976 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10000” | 4,050 kg (8,929 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger Six 105” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 10.000 (DT) is 12% heavier (475 kg / 1,047 lb) than the SAME Tiger SIX 105 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 10.000 (DT) and the Tiger SIX 105. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10000” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger Six 105” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 10.000 (DT) and the Tiger SIX 105. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10000” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger Six 105” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 10000” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger Six 105” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 10000” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger Six 105” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 10000” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger Six 105” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1978–1993 | 1977–1984 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Landini 10.000 (DT) has 55% more hydraulic flow (16.5 L/min / 4.4 gpm) than the SAME Tiger SIX 105 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 10.000 (DT) is 12% heavier (475 kg / 1,047 lb) than the SAME Tiger SIX 105 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 10.000 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Tiger SIX 105 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 10.000 (DT): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10000”); the Tiger SIX 105: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger Six 105”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources