Lamborghini 350 DT or URSUS 2812?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 350 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2812 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Lamborghini 350 DT suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 14% (194 kg / 428 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 350 DT | 2812 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 25.7 kW (34.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 350 DT A” | 27.9 kW (37.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 350 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2812 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 350 DT and the 2812. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 350 DT and the 2812. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 18.8 L/min (5.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 350 DT. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,560 kg (3,439 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 350 DT A” | 1,366 kg (3,012 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | AheadThe Lamborghini 350 DT has 14% more lift (194 kg / 428 lb) than the URSUS 2812 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,110 kg (2,447 lb) to 1,180 kg (2,601 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 350 DT A” | 2,020 kg (4,453 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 2812 is 71% heavier (840 kg / 1,852 lb) than the Lamborghini 350 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 350 DT A” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2812. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 350 DT A” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | AheadThe Lamborghini 350 DT has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the URSUS 2812 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 350 DT and the 2812. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 350 DT A” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 350 DT A” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | AheadThe Lamborghini 350 DT offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the URSUS 2812 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 350 DT and the 2812. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 350 DT A” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812” | AheadThe Lamborghini 350 DT is available with four-wheel drive; the URSUS 2812 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1992–2003 | 1988–2009 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lamborghini 350 DT has 14% more lift (194 kg / 428 lb) than the URSUS 2812 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The URSUS 2812 is 71% heavier (840 kg / 1,852 lb) than the Lamborghini 350 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini 350 DT has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the URSUS 2812 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini 350 DT offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the URSUS 2812 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Lamborghini 350 DT is available with four-wheel drive; the URSUS 2812 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 350 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2812 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources