Lamborghini 250 DT or SAME 25 DT?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the SAME 25 DT: hydraulic flow.
- The SAME 25 DT suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 165% (13.7 L/min / 3.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 250 DT | 25 DT | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 15.8 kW (21.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 250 DT A” | 15.8 kW (21.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 25” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 250 DT and the 25 DT. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 250 DT and the 25 DT. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 8.3 L/min (2.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 250 DT A” | 22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 25” | AheadThe SAME 25 DT has 165% more hydraulic flow (13.7 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Lamborghini 250 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 250 DT A” | 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 25” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 970 kg (2,138 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 250 DT A” | 1,005 kg (2,216 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 25” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 2,100 kg (4,630 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 250 DT A” | 2,100 kg (4,630 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 25” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 250 DT A” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 25” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 250 DT and the 25 DT. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 250 DT A” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 25” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 250 DT A” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 25” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 250 DT A” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 25” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Runner 250 DT A” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 25” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1992–2003 | 1992–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The SAME 25 DT has 165% more hydraulic flow (13.7 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Lamborghini 250 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources