Lamborghini 950 DT or New Holland 8160?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the New Holland 8160: hydraulic flow, three-point lift and maximum permissible mass.
- The New Holland 8160 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 63% (38.6 L/min / 10.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 36% (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) more three-point lift.
- The New Holland 8160 suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 950 DT | 8160 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 67.4 kW (90.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A” | 66.5 kW (89.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8160” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 950 DT and the 8160. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 950 DT and the 8160. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 61.0 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A” | 99.6 L/min (26.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8160” | AheadThe New Holland 8160 has 63% more hydraulic flow (38.6 L/min / 10.2 gpm) than the Lamborghini 950 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,600 kg (7,937 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A” | 4,900 kg (10,803 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8160” | AheadThe New Holland 8160 has 36% more lift (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the Lamborghini 950 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,280 kg (9,436 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A” | 5,250 kg (11,574 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8160” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 8160 is 23% heavier (970 kg / 2,138 lb) than the Lamborghini 950 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A” | 7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8160” | AheadThe New Holland 8160 has 25% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Lamborghini 950 DT (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 20 to 60Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A” | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8160” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 950 DT and the 8160. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8160” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8160” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8160” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 950 DT. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8160” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1995–2004 | 1996–1999 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland 8160 has 63% more hydraulic flow (38.6 L/min / 10.2 gpm) than the Lamborghini 950 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 8160 has 36% more lift (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the Lamborghini 950 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 8160 is 23% heavier (970 kg / 2,138 lb) than the Lamborghini 950 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 8160 has 25% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Lamborghini 950 DT (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources