Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 4225 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Crono-Target 70 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 4225 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (550 kg / 1,213 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) and Massey Ferguson MF 4225 (A), with the call on each
QuestionCrono-Target 70 (DT)MF 4225 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Crono-Target 70 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 4225 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Crono-Target 70 (DT) and the MF 4225 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Crono-Target 70 (DT) and the MF 4225 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Crono-Target 70 (DT) and the MF 4225 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”2,450 kg (5,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225”AheadThe Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) has 22% more lift (550 kg / 1,213 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 4225 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,070 kg (4,564 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”3,490 kg (7,694 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 4225 (A) is 69% heavier (1,420 kg / 3,131 lb) than the Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Crono-Target 70 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”12 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Crono-Target 70 (DT) and the MF 4225 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 4225 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 4225 (A).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2005–20091997–2001Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) has 22% more lift (550 kg / 1,213 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 4225 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 4225 (A) is 69% heavier (1,420 kg / 3,131 lb) than the Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 4225 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Crono-Target 70 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 4225 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources