Kramer KB 22 C or Lanz D 7506 Allzweck?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Kramer KB 22C is ahead on top speed.
- The Kramer KB 22C suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (2.3 km/h / 1.4 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | KB 22 C | D 7506 Allzweck | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 14.7 kW (20 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 22 C” | 14.7 kW (20 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 7506 Allzweck” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the KB 22 C and the D 7506 Allzweck. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the KB 22 C and the D 7506 Allzweck. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 16.0 L/min (4.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 22 C” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 7506 Allzweck. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 720 kg (1,587 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 22 C” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 7506 Allzweck. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,170 kg (2,579 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 22 C” | 2,880 kg (6,349 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 7506 Allzweck” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lanz D 7506 Allzweck is 146% heavier (1,710 kg / 3,770 lb) than the Kramer KB 22C (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the KB 22 C and the D 7506 Allzweck. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 22 C” | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 7506 Allzweck” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the KB 22 C and the D 7506 Allzweck. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 22 C” | 17.7 km/h (11.0 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 7506 Allzweck” | AheadThe Kramer KB 22C has 13% more top speed (2.3 km/h / 1.4 mph) than the Lanz D 7506 Allzweck (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 528 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 22 C” | 760Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 7506 Allzweck” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the KB 22 C and the D 7506 Allzweck. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the KB 22 C and the D 7506 Allzweck. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 22 C” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 7506 Allzweck” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1951–1954 | 1939–1942 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Kramer KB 22C is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lanz D 7506 Allzweck is 146% heavier (1,710 kg / 3,770 lb) than the Kramer KB 22C (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Kramer KB 22C has 13% more top speed (2.3 km/h / 1.4 mph) than the Lanz D 7506 Allzweck (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Kramer KB 22C is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources