Kramer K 28 or Lanz D 9521?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the K 28 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 9521 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Kramer K 28 suits road haulage better on this data: 16% (2.7 km/h / 1.7 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | K 28 | D 9521 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 20.5 kW (27.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer K 28” | 22.0 kW (29.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9521” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the K 28 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 9521 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the K 28 and the D 9521. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the K 28 and the D 9521. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the K 28 and the D 9521. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the K 28 and the D 9521. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer K 28” | 3,850 kg (8,488 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9521” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lanz D 9521 is 93% heavier (1,850 kg / 4,079 lb) than the Kramer K 28 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the K 28 and the D 9521. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 4 to 5Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer K 28” | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9521” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the K 28 and the D 9521. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 19.7 km/h (12.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer K 28” | 17.0 km/h (10.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9521” | AheadThe Kramer K 28 has 16% more top speed (2.7 km/h / 1.7 mph) than the Lanz D 9521 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer K 28” | 517/615 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9521” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the D 9521. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the K 28 and the D 9521. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer K 28” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9521” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1947–1950 | 1934–1936 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Kramer K 28 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lanz D 9521 is 93% heavier (1,850 kg / 4,079 lb) than the Kramer K 28 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Kramer K 28 has 16% more top speed (2.7 km/h / 1.7 mph) than the Lanz D 9521 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Kramer K 28 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the K 28 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 9521 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources