Kramer K 28 vs Lanz D 9521

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

Kramer K 28

1947–1950

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

Lanz D 9521

1934–1936

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the K 28 and the D 9521 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

9 material differences · 0 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Kramer K 28 and Lanz D 9521, field by field
FieldK 28D 9521Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed27.5 hp29.5 hp+7% D 9521
Engine declaredGüldner 2F
Displacement declared2.60 L
Transmission
Top speed declared12.2 mph · 19.7 km/h10.6 mph · 17.0 km/h+16% K 28
Clutch declaredsingle-disc dry clutch by Fichtel & SachsPedal operated three shoe clutch with clutch brakediffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Rear PTO speeds declared540 rpm517/615 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared4,409 lb · 2,000 kg8,488 lb · 3,850 kg+93% D 9521
Wheelbase declared71.7 in · 1,820 mm76.4 in · 1,940 mm+7% D 9521
Length declared112.2 in · 2,850 mm129.9 in · 3,300 mm+16% D 9521
Width declared61.0 in · 1,550 mm70.9 in · 1,800 mm+16% D 9521
Height declared60.0 in · 1,525 mm73.2 in · 1,860 mm+22% D 9521
Ground clearance declared11.8 in · 300 mm
Turning radius, braked declared6.6 ft · 2.00 m
Fuel tank declared29.6 qt · 28 L95.1 qt · 90 L+221% D 9521

Kramer K 28 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer K 28”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AF 30”

Lanz D 9521 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9521”