John Deere-LANZ 710 or Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A"?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 710 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 83% (13.0 L/min / 3.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 14% (250 kg / 551 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for John Deere-LANZ 710 and Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A", with the call on each
Question710R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A"Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710”36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 710 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 710 and the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A".
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 710 and the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A".
Which pumps more oil for implements?15.6 L/min (4.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710”28.6 L/min (7.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”AheadThe Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has 83% more hydraulic flow (13.0 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the John Deere-LANZ 710 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710”2,050 kg (4,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”AheadThe Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has 14% more lift (250 kg / 551 lb) than the John Deere-LANZ 710 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,234 kg (4,925 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710”2,010 kg (4,431 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere-LANZ 710 is 11% heavier (224 kg / 494 lb) than the Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A".
Which has the wider choice of gears?10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710”12Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 710 and the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A".
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 710 and the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A".
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 710”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500”AheadThe Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" is available with four-wheel drive; the John Deere-LANZ 710 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1965–19671973–1983Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has 83% more hydraulic flow (13.0 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the John Deere-LANZ 710 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has 14% more lift (250 kg / 551 lb) than the John Deere-LANZ 710 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere-LANZ 710 is 11% heavier (224 kg / 494 lb) than the Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" is available with four-wheel drive; the John Deere-LANZ 710 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 710 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources