John Deere-LANZ 100 vs MASSEY-HARRIS Pony 820
11 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 100 and the Pony 820 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
11 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 100 | Pony 820 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 17.7 hp | 18.0 hp | — |
| Engine declared | John Deere 204 | HANOMAG D 621-E 54 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 1.18 L | 1.02 L | +16% 100 |
| Maximum torque declared | — | 58 lb·ft · 78 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | 9.3 mph · 15 km/h | +33% 100 |
| Clutch declared | pedal-operated dry Fichtel and Sachs single-plate clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 1.8 gpm · 7.0 L/min | 2.5 gpm · 9.5 L/min | +36% Pony 820 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 534 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 2,712 lb · 1,230 kg | 2,315 lb · 1,050 kg | +17% 100 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 4,409 lb · 2,000 kg | — | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 73.2 in · 1,860 mm | 67.3 in · 1,710 mm | +9% 100 |
| Length declared | 122.8 in · 3,120 mm | 110.2 in · 2,800 mm | +11% 100 |
| Width declared | 57.9 in · 1,470 mm | 56.0 in · 1,422 mm | — |
| Height declared | 54.6 in · 1,388 mm | 60.0 in · 1,524 mm | +10% Pony 820 |
| Ground clearance declared | 14.8 in · 375 mm | 18.5 in · 470 mm | +25% Pony 820 |
| Fuel tank declared | 31.7 qt · 30.0 L | 27.5 qt · 26.0 L | +15% 100 |
John Deere-LANZ 100 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 100”
MASSEY-HARRIS Pony 820 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris Pony 820”