John Deere 8320 T vs Lamborghini 240 Traction

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2002–2005

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1993–1994

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 8320 T and the 240 Traction → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

John Deere 8320 T and Lamborghini 240 Traction, field by field
Field	8320 T	240 Traction	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	247 hp	240.7 hp	—
Engine declared	John Deere-PowerTech 6.081 HRW-25	Cummins 6 CTA 8.3 A	differs
Displacement declared	8.13 L	8.27 L	—
Maximum torque declared	780 lb·ft · 1,058 N·m	705 lb·ft · 956 N·m	+11% 8320 T
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	+33% 240 Traction
Clutch declared	pedal-operated hydraulic wet John Deere multi-disc clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	—	—
Pump flow declared	34.6 gpm · 131.0 L/min	20.5 gpm · 77.6 L/min	+69% 8320 T
Pressure declared	2,944 psi · 203 bar	2,756 psi · 190 bar	+7% 8320 T
Three-point lift at ends declared	16,535 lb · 7,500 kg	16,755 lb · 7,600 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	1000 rpm	1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	26,735 lb · 12,127 kg	19,623 lb · 8,901 kg	+36% 8320 T
Maximum permissible mass declared	31,500 lb · 14,288 kg	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	+19% 8320 T
Wheelbase declared	89.0 in · 2,260 mm	116.1 in · 2,950 mm	+31% 240 Traction
Length declared	217.7 in · 5,530 mm	194.0 in · 4,928 mm	+12% 8320 T
Width declared	103.7 in · 2,634 mm	96.1 in · 2,440 mm	+8% 8320 T
Height declared	122.9 in · 3,122 mm	123.8 in · 3,145 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	13.8 in · 350 mm	14.8 in · 376 mm	+7% 240 Traction
Fuel tank declared	519.9 qt · 492.0 L	—	—

Source

Source