John Deere 820 or John Deere-LANZ 310?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 820 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 310 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 820 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 67% (10.4 L/min / 2.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The John Deere 820 suits road haulage better on this data: 32% (840 kg / 1,852 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 820 | 310 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 23.5 kW (31.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 820” | 23.5 kW (31.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 820 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 310 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 820 and the 310. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 820 and the 310. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 26.0 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 820” | 15.6 L/min (4.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | AheadThe John Deere 820 has 67% more hydraulic flow (10.4 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the John Deere-LANZ 310 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,245 kg (2,745 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 820” | 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,150 kg (4,740 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 820” | 1,978 kg (4,361 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 820” | 2,660 kg (5,864 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | AheadThe John Deere 820 has 32% higher maximum permissible mass (840 kg / 1,852 lb) than the John Deere-LANZ 310 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 7Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 820” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | AheadThe John Deere-LANZ 310 has 43% more forward gears (3 gears) than the John Deere 820 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 820 and the 310. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 820” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 820” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 820” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 310. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 820” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1967–1975 | 1964–1968 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 820 has 67% more hydraulic flow (10.4 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the John Deere-LANZ 310 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 820 has 32% higher maximum permissible mass (840 kg / 1,852 lb) than the John Deere-LANZ 310 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere-LANZ 310 has 43% more forward gears (3 gears) than the John Deere 820 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 820 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 310 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources