John Deere 820 vs John Deere-LANZ 310
9 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 820 and the 310 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
9 material differences · 8 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 820 | 310 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 31.5 hp | 31.5 hp | — |
| Engine declared | John Deere M 4 3 L 9 or 3.152 DL-01 | John Deere 152 D 25 L | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.47 L | 2.49 L | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 12.4–15.5 mph · 20–25 km/h | 12.4–15.5 mph · 20–25 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Pedal operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single disc clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 6.9 gpm · 26.0 L/min | 4.1 gpm · 15.6 L/min | +67% 820 |
| Pressure declared | 1,944 psi · 134 bar | 2,190 psi · 151 bar | +13% 310 |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 2,745 lb · 1,245 kg | 2,646 lb · 1,200 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 4,740 lb · 2,150 kg | 4,361 lb · 1,978 kg | +9% 820 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 7,716 lb · 3,500 kg | 5,864 lb · 2,660 kg | +32% 820 |
| Wheelbase declared | 74.4 in · 1,890 mm | 81.6 in · 2,072 mm | +10% 310 |
| Length declared | 134.8 in · 3,425 mm | 133.9 in · 3,400 mm | — |
| Width declared | 59.1 in · 1,500 mm | 62.2 in · 1,580 mm | +5% 310 |
| Height declared | 59.6 in · 1,515 mm | 61.8 in · 1,570 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.7 in · 400 mm | 15.7 in · 400 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 9.2 ft · 2.80 m | 10.8 ft · 3.30 m | +18% 310 |
| Fuel tank declared | 66.0 qt · 62.5 L | 74.0 qt · 70 L | +12% 310 |
John Deere 820 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 820”
John Deere-LANZ 310 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310”