John Deere 5200 (A) or New Holland 3235?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 5200 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3235 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 5200 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 28% (9.7 L/min / 2.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The John Deere 5200 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 12% (207 kg / 456 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 5200 (A) | 3235 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 29.4 kW (39.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5200 (USA)” | 28.7 kW (38.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5200 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3235 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5200 (A) and the 3235. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5200 (A) and the 3235. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 44.7 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5200 (USA)” | 35.0 L/min (9.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | AheadThe John Deere 5200 (A) has 28% more hydraulic flow (9.7 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the New Holland 3235 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,725 kg (3,803 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5200 (USA)” | 1,690 kg (3,726 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,927 kg (4,248 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5200 (USA)” | 1,720 kg (3,792 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 5200 (A) is 12% heavier (207 kg / 456 lb) than the New Holland 3235 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5200 (A) and the 3235. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 9 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5200 (USA)” | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5200 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5200 (USA)” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5200 (USA)” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5200 (USA)” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5200 (USA)” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | AheadThe John Deere 5200 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the New Holland 3235 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1992–1997 | 1996–1999 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 5200 (A) has 28% more hydraulic flow (9.7 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the New Holland 3235 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 5200 (A) is 12% heavier (207 kg / 456 lb) than the New Holland 3235 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 5200 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the New Holland 3235 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5200 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3235 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources