John Deere 2950 (A) or Steyr 988 (a)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 2950 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 988 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for John Deere 2950 (A) and Steyr 988 (a), with the call on each
Question2950 (A)988 (a)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?62.6 kW (83.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950”62.6 kW (83.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 988”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2950 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 988 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2950 (A) and the 988 (a).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2950 (A) and the 988 (a).
Which pumps more oil for implements?87.1 L/min (23.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 988 (a).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 988”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 2950 (A).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,127 kg (9,098 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950”3,445 kg (7,595 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 988”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2950 (A) is 20% heavier (682 kg / 1,504 lb) than the Steyr 988 (a) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,980 kg (13,184 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 988 (a).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950”12Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 988”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2950 (A) and the 988 (a).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 988”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?—540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 988”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 2950 (A).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950”liveTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 988”AheadThe John Deere 2950 (A) has an independent PTO; the Steyr 988 (a)’s is live.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 988”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1983–19881977–1979Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2950 (A) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The John Deere 2950 (A) is 20% heavier (682 kg / 1,504 lb) than the Steyr 988 (a) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere 2950 (A) has an independent PTO; the Steyr 988 (a)’s is live.
  • The John Deere 2950 (A) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2950 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 988 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO speeds.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources