John Deere 2300 (A) or VALMET 465 (465-4)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 2300 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 465 (465-4) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 2300 (A) | 465 (465-4) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | 51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 465” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2300 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 465 (465-4) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2300 (A) and the 465 (465-4). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2300 (A) and the 465 (465-4). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 40.2 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | 55.0 L/min (14.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 465” | AheadThe VALMET 465 (465-4) has 37% more hydraulic flow (14.8 L/min / 3.9 gpm) than the John Deere 2300 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,030 kg (8,885 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | 2,580 kg (5,688 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 465” | AheadThe John Deere 2300 (A) has 56% more lift (1,450 kg / 3,197 lb) than the VALMET 465 (465-4) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,260 kg (7,187 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | 2,820 kg (6,217 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 465” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2300 (A) is 16% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the VALMET 465 (465-4) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,600 kg (12,346 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 465 (465-4). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 465” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2300 (A) and the 465 (465-4). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 465” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | 540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 465” | AheadThe John Deere 2300 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 465 (465-4) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 465” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 465” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1996 | 1993–1997 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VALMET 465 (465-4) has 37% more hydraulic flow (14.8 L/min / 3.9 gpm) than the John Deere 2300 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2300 (A) has 56% more lift (1,450 kg / 3,197 lb) than the VALMET 465 (465-4) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2300 (A) is 16% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the VALMET 465 (465-4) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2300 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 465 (465-4) does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2300 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 465 (465-4) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources