J.I. Case Case CCS vs Kramer K 28
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because they were not built in overlapping years (1937–1938; 1947–1950). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
7 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | Case CCS | K 28 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 27.1 hp | 27.5 hp | — |
| Engine declared | — | Güldner 2F | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 2.60 L | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 11.0 mph · 17.7 km/h | 12.2 mph · 19.7 km/h | +11% K 28 |
| Clutch declared | Hand lever operated double disc clutch, located inside the pulley | single-disc dry clutch by Fichtel & Sachs | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 535 rpm | 540 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 4,134 lb · 1,875 kg | 4,409 lb · 2,000 kg | +7% K 28 |
| Wheelbase declared | 87.2 in · 2,216 mm | 71.7 in · 1,820 mm | +22% Case CCS |
| Length declared | 114.0 in · 2,896 mm | 112.2 in · 2,850 mm | — |
| Width declared | 60.0 in · 1,524 mm | 61.0 in · 1,550 mm | — |
| Height declared | 53.0 in · 1,346 mm | 60.0 in · 1,525 mm | +13% K 28 |
| Ground clearance declared | 30.0 in · 762 mm | 11.8 in · 300 mm | +154% Case CCS |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 6.6 ft · 2.00 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | — | 29.6 qt · 28 L | — |
J.I. Case Case CCS sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case CCS”
Kramer K 28 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer K 28”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AF 30”