J.I. Case 640 vs SAME Centauro 60

7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1960–1969

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1969–1972

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 640 and the Centauro 60 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

7 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

J.I. Case 640 and SAME Centauro 60, field by field
Field	640	Centauro 60	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	52.0 hp	56.2 hp	+8% Centauro 60
Engine declared	—	SAME DA 021-954/V	—
Displacement declared	—	3.40 L	—
Maximum torque declared	—	148 lb·ft · 201 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	12.4–21.7 mph · 20–35 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	—	Pedal-operated dry two-stage double clutch with coil springs	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	9.3 gpm · 35.2 L/min	4.3 gpm · 16.3 L/min	+116% 640
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	4,495 lb · 2,039 kg	4,696 lb · 2,130 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	79.3 in · 2,013 mm	84.6 in · 2,150 mm	+7% Centauro 60
Length declared	134.5 in · 3,416 mm	140.2 in · 3,560 mm	—
Width declared	80.7 in · 2,051 mm	68.5 in · 1,740 mm	+18% 640
Height declared	63.5 in · 1,613 mm	61.8 in · 1,570 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	20.9 in · 530 mm	18.5 in · 470 mm	+13% 640
Turning radius, braked declared	9.8 ft · 3.00 m	11.1 ft · 3.37 m	+12% Centauro 60
Fuel tank declared	69.2 qt · 65.5 L	79.3 qt · 75.0 L	+15% Centauro 60

Source

Source