J.I. Case 610-B or Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A"?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A": hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on forward gears, PTO speeds and drive.
- The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 151% (17.2 L/min / 4.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 11% (192 kg / 423 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 610-B | R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 30.7 kW (41.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | 31.0 kW (41.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 610-B and the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A". |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 610-B and the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A". |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 11.4 L/min (3.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | 28.6 L/min (7.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | AheadThe Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has 151% more hydraulic flow (17.2 L/min / 4.5 gpm) than the J.I. Case 610-B (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 2,050 kg (4,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 610-B. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,818 kg (4,008 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | 2,010 kg (4,431 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" is 11% heavier (192 kg / 423 lb) than the J.I. Case 610-B (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 610-B and the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A". |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | AheadThe Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 610-B (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 610-B and the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A". |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | AheadThe Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the J.I. Case 610-B does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A". |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 610-B” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | AheadThe Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 610-B is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1958–1959 | 1973–1983 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has 151% more hydraulic flow (17.2 L/min / 4.5 gpm) than the J.I. Case 610-B (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" is 11% heavier (192 kg / 423 lb) than the J.I. Case 610-B (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 610-B (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the J.I. Case 610-B does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 610-B is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources