J.I. Case 431 or Renault Super 5-D (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the J.I. Case 431: hydraulic flow. On features, the Renault Super 5-D (A) is ahead on drive.

  • The J.I. Case 431 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 79% (14.2 L/min / 3.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Renault Super 5-D (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for J.I. Case 431 and Renault Super 5-D (A), with the call on each
Question431Super 5-D (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?25.0 kW (33.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 431”24.9 kW (33.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 431 and the Super 5-D (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 431 and the Super 5-D (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.2 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 431”18.0 L/min (4.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054”AheadThe J.I. Case 431 has 79% more hydraulic flow (14.2 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the Renault Super 5-D (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,760 kg (3,880 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 431.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,741 kg (3,838 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 431”1,585 kg (3,494 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 431 and the Super 5-D (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?4 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 431”10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 431 and the Super 5-D (A).
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 431”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 431”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 431”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Super 5-D (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 431”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054”AheadThe Renault Super 5-D (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 431 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1960–19691965–1967Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Super 5-D (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The J.I. Case 431 has 79% more hydraulic flow (14.2 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the Renault Super 5-D (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Super 5-D (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 431 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault Super 5-D (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources