J.I. Case 2096 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 3630?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Massey Ferguson MF 3630: three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3630 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 64% (2,398 kg / 5,287 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for J.I. Case 2096 (DT) and Massey Ferguson MF 3630, with the call on each
Question2096 (DT)MF 3630Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?86.3 kW (115.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2096”85.5 kW (114.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2096 (DT) and the MF 3630.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2096 (DT) and the MF 3630.
Which pumps more oil for implements?87.1 L/min (23.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2096”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 3630.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,742 kg (8,250 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2096”6,140 kg (13,536 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 3630 has 64% more lift (2,398 kg / 5,287 lb) than the J.I. Case 2096 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,386 kg (11,874 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2096”5,405 kg (11,916 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2096 (DT) and the MF 3630.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2096”16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 3630 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 2096 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2096 (DT) and the MF 3630.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2096”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2096”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2096”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2096”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19851987–1990EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3630 has 64% more lift (2,398 kg / 5,287 lb) than the J.I. Case 2096 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3630 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 2096 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources