J.I. Case 1896 (DT) or VALMET 905-4?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VALMET 905-4: three-point lift.

  • The VALMET 905-4 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 40% (1,197 kg / 2,639 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for J.I. Case 1896 (DT) and VALMET 905-4, with the call on each
Question1896 (DT)905-4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?71.5 kW (95.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”71.8 kW (96.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1896 (DT) and the 905-4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1896 (DT) and the 905-4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?47.5 L/min (12.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1896 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,993 kg (6,598 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”4,190 kg (9,237 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”AheadThe VALMET 905-4 has 40% more lift (1,197 kg / 2,639 lb) than the J.I. Case 1896 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,375 kg (11,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”4,130 kg (9,105 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 1896 (DT) is 30% heavier (1,245 kg / 2,745 lb) than the VALMET 905-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1896 (DT) and the 905-4.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”14 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1896 (DT) and the 905-4.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 905”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19851984–1989EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 905-4 has 40% more lift (1,197 kg / 2,639 lb) than the J.I. Case 1896 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The J.I. Case 1896 (DT) is 30% heavier (1,245 kg / 2,745 lb) than the VALMET 905-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources