J.I. Case 1896 (DT) or VALMET 6600-4 (6600E)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VALMET 6600-4 (6600E): three-point lift.
- The VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 96% (2,872 kg / 6,332 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1896 (DT) | 6600-4 (6600E) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 71.5 kW (95.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896” | 71.8 kW (96.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1896 (DT) and the 6600-4 (6600E). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1896 (DT) and the 6600-4 (6600E). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 80.3 L/min (21.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1896 (DT). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,993 kg (6,598 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896” | 5,865 kg (12,930 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600” | AheadThe VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) has 96% more lift (2,872 kg / 6,332 lb) than the J.I. Case 1896 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,375 kg (11,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896” | 4,400 kg (9,700 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 1896 (DT) is 22% heavier (975 kg / 2,150 lb) than the VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1896 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896” | 12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1896 (DT) and the 6600-4 (6600E). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1896” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1896” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1896” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1984–1985 | 1991–2000 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) has 96% more lift (2,872 kg / 6,332 lb) than the J.I. Case 1896 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 1896 (DT) is 22% heavier (975 kg / 2,150 lb) than the VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources