J.I. Case 1896 (DT) vs OLIVER 1865
5 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 1896 (DT) and the 1865 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
5 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 1896 (DT) | 1865 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 93.7 hp | 97.6 hp | — |
| Engine declared | CUMMINS B6T-590 | MINNEAPOLIS-MOLINE D 451/6 or 425 C/6 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 5.88 L | — | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 364 lb·ft · 493 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | — | Foot-operated dry single-disc clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | — | Open centre | — |
| Pump flow declared | — | 17.4 gpm · 66.0 L/min | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 6,598 lb · 2,993 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 11,850 lb · 5,375 kg | 10,331 lb · 4,686 kg | +15% 1896 (DT) |
| Wheelbase declared | 108.0 in · 2,743 mm | 103.7 in · 2,633 mm | — |
| Length declared | 171.0 in · 4,343 mm | — | — |
| Width declared | 101.1 in · 2,567 mm | — | — |
| Height declared | 118.0 in · 2,997 mm | — | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 16.0 in · 406 mm | — | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 13.1 ft · 3.99 m | 10.8 ft · 3.28 m | +22% 1896 (DT) |
| Fuel tank declared | 259.9 qt · 246.0 L | 160.1 qt · 151.5 L | +62% 1896 (DT) |
J.I. Case 1896 (DT) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”
OLIVER 1865 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1865”