J.I. Case 1090 vs OLIVER 1950 (4 WD)

7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

J.I. Case 1090

1970

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

OLIVER 1950 (4 WD)

1964–1974

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 1090 and the 1950 (4 WD) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

7 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

J.I. Case 1090 and OLIVER 1950 (4 WD), field by field
Field10901950 (4 WD)Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed121.2 hp105.5 hp+15% 1090
Engine declaredCASE A-451GENERAL-MOTORS 4V-53 Ndiffers
Displacement declared7.39 L3.48 L+112% 1090
Maximum torque declared271 lb·ft · 367 N·m
Transmission
Top speed declared15.5 mph · 25 km/h15.5 mph · 25 km/h
Clutch declaredFoot-operated dry Borg & Beck single-disc clutch
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared16.0 gpm · 60.6 L/min11.8 gpm · 44.5 L/min+36% 1090
Rear PTO speeds declared1000 rpm549/984 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared10,395 lb · 4,715 kg12,974 lb · 5,885 kg+25% 1950 (4 WD)
Wheelbase declared108.0 in · 2,743 mm105.0 in · 2,667 mm
Length declared162.0 in · 4,115 mm159.5 in · 4,051 mm
Width declared88.0 in · 2,235 mm86.5 in · 2,197 mm
Height declared78.0 in · 1,981 mm75.0 in · 1,904 mm
Ground clearance declared15.0 in · 381 mm18.5 in · 470 mm+23% 1950 (4 WD)
Turning radius, braked declared13.0 ft · 3.97 m12.9 ft · 3.94 m
Fuel tank declared200.0 qt · 189.3 L111.0 qt · 105.0 L+80% 1090

J.I. Case 1090 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1090”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1070”

OLIVER 1950 (4 WD) sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1950”