J.I. Case 1031 vs SAME Buffalo DT

5 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1966–1969

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1968–1974

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 1031 and the Buffalo DT → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

5 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

J.I. Case 1031 and SAME Buffalo DT, field by field
Field	1031	Buffalo DT	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	102.1 hp	103.5 hp	—
Engine declared	—	SAME DA 1006-V	—
Displacement declared	—	5.66 L	—
Maximum torque declared	—	280 lb·ft · 380 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	—
Clutch declared	—	Pedal-operated dry SAME single-disc clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	12.0 gpm · 45.4 L/min	7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min	+51% 1031
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	6,614 lb · 3,000 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	9,334 lb · 4,234 kg	9,524 lb · 4,320 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	108.9 in · 2,767 mm	100.8 in · 2,560 mm	+8% 1031
Length declared	165.0 in · 4,191 mm	157.5 in · 4,000 mm	—
Width declared	88.0 in · 2,235 mm	85.8 in · 2,180 mm	—
Height declared	72.0 in · 1,829 mm	75.6 in · 1,920 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	16.0 in · 406 mm	17.3 in · 440 mm	+8% Buffalo DT
Turning radius, braked declared	11.2 ft · 3.43 m	16.4 ft · 5.00 m	+46% Buffalo DT
Fuel tank declared	192.0 qt · 181.7 L	—	—

Source

Source