International Harvester International 340 or Kramer KL 400?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the International 340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the KL 400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The International Harvester International 340 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 81% (16.1 L/min / 4.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | International 340 | KL 400 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 27.9 kW (37.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | 27.8 kW (37.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 400” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the International 340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the KL 400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the International 340 and the KL 400. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the International 340 and the KL 400. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 36.1 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | 20.0 L/min (5.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 400” | AheadThe International Harvester International 340 has 81% more hydraulic flow (16.1 L/min / 4.3 gpm) than the Kramer KL 400 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 1,250 kg (2,756 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 400” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the International 340. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,356 kg (5,194 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | 1,790 kg (3,946 lb) to 1,950 kg (4,299 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 400” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester International 340 is 21% heavier (406 kg / 895 lb) than the Kramer KL 400 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 2,500 kg (5,512 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 400” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the International 340. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 5 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 400” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the International 340 and the KL 400. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | 20.0 km/h (12.4 mph) to 27.4 km/h (17.0 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 400” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | 585 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 400” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the KL 400. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 400” | AheadThe Kramer KL 400 has an independent PTO; the International Harvester International 340’s is dependent (stops with the clutch). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 400” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1958–1963 | 1960–1967 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester International 340 has 81% more hydraulic flow (16.1 L/min / 4.3 gpm) than the Kramer KL 400 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester International 340 is 21% heavier (406 kg / 895 lb) than the Kramer KL 400 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Kramer KL 400 has an independent PTO; the International Harvester International 340’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the International 340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the KL 400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO speeds.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources