International Harvester 786 or Landini 9800 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Landini 9800 (DT): hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on forward gears.

  • The Landini 9800 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 12% (5.6 L/min / 1.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for International Harvester 786 and Landini 9800 (DT), with the call on each
Question7869800 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?57.8 kW (77.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 786”58.0 kW (77.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 786 and the 9800 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 786 and the 9800 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?45.5 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 786”51.1 L/min (13.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”AheadThe Landini 9800 (DT) has 12% more hydraulic flow (5.6 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the International Harvester 786 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,670 kg (10,296 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 786.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,257 kg (11,590 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 786”4,080 kg (8,995 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 786 is 29% heavier (1,177 kg / 2,595 lb) than the Landini 9800 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 786.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 786”32Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”AheadThe Landini 9800 (DT) has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the International Harvester 786 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 786 and the 9800 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 786”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 786”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 786.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 786”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 9800 DT”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1980–19811987–2000Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 9800 (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Landini 9800 (DT) has 12% more hydraulic flow (5.6 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the International Harvester 786 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 786 is 29% heavier (1,177 kg / 2,595 lb) than the Landini 9800 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini 9800 (DT) has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the International Harvester 786 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini 9800 (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources