International Harvester 1466 vs OLIVER 2655
8 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (47%); the drive differs (Two-wheel or four-wheel drive; 4WD). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
8 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 1466 | 2655 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 133.2 hp | 141.1 hp | +6% 2655 |
| Engine declared | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER DT-436 | — | — |
| Displacement declared | 7.14 L | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 23.6 mph · 38 km/h | +27% 2655 |
| Clutch declared | Pedal operated ceramic clutch | Foot-operated dry single-plate clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | — | Open centre | — |
| Pump flow declared | 12.0 gpm · 45.5 L/min | 17.0 gpm · 64.3 L/min | +41% 2655 |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 5,798 lb · 2,630 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1000 rpm | 1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 13,479 lb · 6,114 kg | 19,850 lb · 9,004 kg | +47% 2655 |
| Wheelbase declared | 104.8 in · 2,662 mm | 120.0 in · 3,048 mm | +15% 2655 |
| Length declared | 168.0 in · 4,267 mm | 234.0 in · 5,944 mm | +39% 2655 |
| Width declared | 98.0 in · 2,489 mm | 96.0 in · 2,438 mm | — |
| Height declared | 111.0 in · 2,819 mm | 99.0 in · 2,515 mm | +12% 1466 |
| Ground clearance declared | 16.0 in · 406 mm | — | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.7 ft · 3.56 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 168.0 qt · 159.0 L | 400.0 qt · 378.5 L | +138% 2655 |
International Harvester 1466 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1466”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 1466”
OLIVER 2655 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2655”