International Harvester Farmall H/HV vs International Harvester Super FC-C

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1939–1953

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1952–1957

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Farmall H/HV and the Super FC-C → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

International Harvester Farmall H/HV and International Harvester Super FC-C, field by field
Field	Farmall H/HV	Super FC-C	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	25.6 hp	24 hp	+6% Farmall H/HV
Engine declared	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-153	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-123	differs
Displacement declared	2.49 L	2.01 L	+24% Farmall H/HV
Maximum torque declared	—	116 lb·ft · 157 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	16.2 mph · 26 km/h	10.6 mph · 17 km/h	+53% Farmall H/HV
Clutch declared	Pedal operated dry Rockford single disc clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	—	4.6 gpm · 17.3 L/min	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	541 rpm	539 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	3,726 lb · 1,690 kg	3,175 lb · 1,440 kg	+17% Farmall H/HV
Wheelbase declared	88.5 in · 2,248 mm	91.5 in · 2,324 mm	—
Length declared	125.2 in · 3,181 mm	129.5 in · 3,290 mm	—
Width declared	75.0 in · 1,905 mm	78.0 in · 1,980 mm	—
Height declared	74.0 in · 1,880 mm	71.3 in · 1,810 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	24.6 in · 625 mm	22.4 in · 570 mm	+10% Farmall H/HV
Turning radius, braked declared	8.1 ft · 2.46 m	12.0 ft · 3.65 m	+48% Super FC-C
Fuel tank declared	50.0 qt · 47.3 L	44.1 qt · 41.75 L	+13% Farmall H/HV

Source

Source